grammarphobia.com

Registreret

Skærmbillede af hjemmesiden

Sideanalyseopdateringsdato: 2026/02/12 06:38:58

Sidste whois opdateringsdato: 2026/01/22 22:04:57

Domænestatus

Registreret

Betalt indtil

03.05.2026

Tilgængelig fra

02.06.2026

SEO-score

88.36%

129

Score opnået

146

Maksimal score

Hovedoplysninger

ℹ️

Titel: Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage

Beskrivelse: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\

Nøgleord: empty

Sidekodning: utf-8

Side filstørrelse: 94 KB

Serverinformation

🖥️

IP: 160.153.0.111

Beliggenhed: United States,US,,,37.751,-97.822,America/Chicago

Http-server: cloudflare

Kodning: utf-8

Metatags liste

🏷️

charset: UTF-8
name: viewport content: width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
name: description content: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\'Conner and Stewart Kellerman
name: robots content: max-image-preview:large
name: google-site-verification content: google-site-verification=K9QFEnysvwuXkcbEIduZgOuyDT5P8jzkq6YECMrZCqE
name: generator content: All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.3
property: og:locale content: en_US
property: og:site_name content: Grammarphobia
property: og:type content: article
property: og:title content: Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage
property: og:description content: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\'Conner and Stewart Kellerman
property: og:url content: https://grammarphobia.com
property: og:image content: https://grammarphobia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mylogo.png
property: og:image:secure_url content: https://grammarphobia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mylogo.png
property: og:image:width content: 268
property: og:image:height content: 200
property: article:published_time content: 2012-04-23T01:56:10+00:00
property: article:modified_time content: 2020-07-31T14:32:01+00:00
property: article:publisher content: https://wwww.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063827867173
name: twitter:card content: summary
name: twitter:title content: Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage
name: twitter:description content: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\'Conner and Stewart Kellerman
name: twitter:image content: https://grammarphobia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mylogo.png

Interne links

🔗

Eksterne links

🌐

Whois information

📄

domain_name: grammarphobia.com

update_date: 2025-05-04T16:45:37Z

update_time: 1746377137

creation_date: 2001-10-25T15:57:27Z

creation_time: 1004025447

expiration_date: 2026-05-03T11:59:59Z

Whois rå data

📋

            Domain Name: GRAMMARPHOBIA.COM
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Domain Status: client delete prohibited
Domain Status: client renew prohibited
Domain Status: client transfer prohibited
Domain Status: client update prohibited
Creation Date: 2001-10-25T15:57:27Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-05-03T11:59:59Z
Updated Date: 2025-05-04T16:45:37Z
Name Server: NS07.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS08.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
REGISTRAR Contact: GoDaddy.com, LLC
>>> Last update of RDAP database: 2026-01-23T01:04:57Z

Robots.txt

🤖

			User-agent: *
Disallow: /wp-admin/
Allow: /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php

Sitemap: https://grammarphobia.com/sitemap.xml

SEO revision

🔍

Teknisk SEO

✓

Svarkode

200

Status 200 OK - siden indlæses korrekt.

✓

Tegnkodning

Page: utf-8, Header: utf-8

Tegnkodning konsekvent mellem HTML og overskrifter.

✓

Sidestørrelse

97213 bytes

Sidestørrelse acceptabel til hurtig indlæsning.

✓

Ressourcer

33 total

Moderat antal ressourcer. Overvej at kombinere filer.

✓

Hreflang Tags

0 hreflang tags

Tilføj hreflang-tags, hvis du har flersproget indhold.

✓

Robots.txt

Exists

Robots.txt-fil fundet.

✓

Sitemap

Declared in robots.txt

Sitemap erklæret i robots.txt.

✓

HTTPS

Yes

Sikker HTTPS-forbindelse aktiveret.

Kompression

Aktiver gzip- eller zstd-komprimering for at reducere filstørrelser.

✓

Caching

public, max-age=2678400

Cache-kontroloverskrifter er korrekt indstillet.

✓

Sidehastighed

0.62 ms

Fremragende læssehastighed.

On-Page SEO

✓

Titel

Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage

God titellængde (30-60 tegn).

✓

Meta beskrivelse

Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\ Lenght:101

God metabeskrivelseslængde (100-160 tegn).

✓

H1 Overskrift

1 found - "For our spin on English,"

Godt - enkelt H1 overskrift fundet.

✓

Ordtælling

531

God indholdslængde (500-2000 ord anbefales).

Kanonisk tag

Tilføj kanonisk tag for at forhindre duplikatindholdsproblemer.

✓

Duplicate Meta

[]

Ingen duplikerede metatags fundet.

✓

Nøgleord

empty

Metanøgleord indstillet (bemærk: bruges ikke af større søgemaskiner).

Indhold og UX

✓

Sprog

Sprog attribut korrekt indstillet.

Billeder

9 total, 8 missing ALT

Tilføj ALT-tekst til billeder for tilgængelighed og SEO.

✓

Udsigtsport

width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0

Viewport-metatag korrekt indstillet til mobilenheder.

✓

Åbn Graph

All OG tags present.

Alle væsentlige OpenGraph-tags til stede.

✓

Strukturerede data

1 JSON-LD scripts

Strukturerede data (JSON-LD) fundet.

Stillinger i Google

Søgesætninger - Google

🔍

Position	Udtryk	Side	Uddrag
2	all is or are	/blog/2006/12/all-is...	The Grammarphobia Blog: “All is” vs. “all are” 18 дек. 2006 г. — If a writer means “all of it,” she should use “is .” If she means “all of them,” she should go with “are.” So it depends on whether your ...
2	full fuller	/blog/2015/07/full-f...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Full, fuller, fullest 31 июл. 2015 г. — “Full” generally means containing as much as possible , but the adjective has many other senses, as in “full of energy,” “full of himself,” “full-fledged,” “a ...
4	all is are	/blog/2006/12/all-is...	The Grammarphobia Blog: “All is” vs. “all are” 18 дек. 2006 г. — If a writer means “all of it,” she should use “is .” If she means “all of them,” she should go with “are.” So it depends on whether your ...
4	who is who has	/blog/2012/03/who-is...	Is “who's” short for “who is” or “who has”? 4 мар. 2012 г. — So “who's” is a legitimate contraction of both “who is” and “who has .” Examples: “Who's he?” … “Who's done the dishes?”.
5	given you	/blog/2023/05/given-...	The Grammarphobia Blog: 'Ask, and it shall be given you' 8 мая 2023 г. — The two clauses, “it shall be given you” and “it shall be given to you” mean the same thing semantically but differ grammatically.
5	to internet	/blog/2020/04/intern...	The Grammarphobia Blog: To internet, or not to internet? 13 апр. 2020 г. — We aren't likely to use “internet” or “science” as a verb , at least not yet. Neither usage is widespread enough.
6(+2)	all are in	/blog/2006/12/all-is...	The Grammarphobia Blog: “All is” vs. “all are” 18 дек. 2006 г. — If a writer means “ all of it,” she should use “is.” If she means “ all of them,” she should go with “are.” So it depends on whether your ...
6	that is one of the	/blog/2016/09/one-of...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Is “one” the one? 23 сент. 2016 г. — So in summary, you can't go wrong with the plural. But go with a singular verb if the “ one ” is uppermost in your mind, and not the class to ...
8	has its	/blog/2022/11/it-is-...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Why 'it's' means 'it is' or 'it has' 14 нояб. 2022 г. — “it's” has been a contraction of both “it is” and “it has” for hundreds of years, though “it's” was once the usual form of the possessive adjective.
8	the or one	/blog/2016/09/one-of...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Is “one” the one? 23 сент. 2016 г. — So in summary, you can't go wrong with the plural . But go with a singular verb if the “one” is uppermost in your mind, and not the class to ...

Stillinger i Yandex

Søgesætninger - Yandex

🔍

Position	Udtryk	Side	Uddrag
4	come going	/blog/2011/11/come-g...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Are you coming or going ? We vote for “Are you coming ?” rather than “Are you going ?” We’ll explain later, but first let’s talk about this business of coming and going .
5	good well best	/blog/2023/03/good-b...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Good , best , or well wishes? A: The usual expression is “ good wishes” or “ best wishes,” but “ well wishes” has been used for hundreds of years in the same sense. All three were first recorded...
5	what is or what are	/blog/2018/03/what-2...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Is ‘what’ singular or plural? As we wrote in 2012, the word “what” can be construed as either singular or plural. It takes its number (singular vs. plural) from the context, and here the context is “books” (plural). Thus, “Books are what make you smarter.”

Yderligere tjenester

💎

grammarphobia.com