grammarphobia.com

Registrert

Skjermbilde av nettstedet

Sideanalyseoppdateringsdato: 2026/02/12 06:38:58

Siste whois-oppdateringsdato: 2026/01/22 22:04:57

Domenestatus

Registrert

Betalt t.o.m

03.05.2026

Tilgjengelig fra

02.06.2026

SEO-poengsum

88.36%

129

Poeng oppnådd

146

Maksimal poengsum

Hovedinformasjon

ℹ️

Tittel: Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage

Beskrivelse: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\

Nøkkelord: empty

Sidekoding: utf-8

Sidefilstørrelse: 94 KB

Serverinformasjon

🖥️

IP: 160.153.0.111

Sted: United States,US,,,37.751,-97.822,America/Chicago

Http-server: cloudflare

Koding: utf-8

Metatags liste

🏷️

charset: UTF-8
name: viewport content: width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
name: description content: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\'Conner and Stewart Kellerman
name: robots content: max-image-preview:large
name: google-site-verification content: google-site-verification=K9QFEnysvwuXkcbEIduZgOuyDT5P8jzkq6YECMrZCqE
name: generator content: All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.3
property: og:locale content: en_US
property: og:site_name content: Grammarphobia
property: og:type content: article
property: og:title content: Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage
property: og:description content: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\'Conner and Stewart Kellerman
property: og:url content: https://grammarphobia.com
property: og:image content: https://grammarphobia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mylogo.png
property: og:image:secure_url content: https://grammarphobia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mylogo.png
property: og:image:width content: 268
property: og:image:height content: 200
property: article:published_time content: 2012-04-23T01:56:10+00:00
property: article:modified_time content: 2020-07-31T14:32:01+00:00
property: article:publisher content: https://wwww.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063827867173
name: twitter:card content: summary
name: twitter:title content: Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage
name: twitter:description content: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\'Conner and Stewart Kellerman
name: twitter:image content: https://grammarphobia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mylogo.png

Interne lenker

🔗

Eksterne lenker

🌐

Whois informasjon

📄

domain_name: grammarphobia.com

update_date: 2025-05-04T16:45:37Z

update_time: 1746377137

creation_date: 2001-10-25T15:57:27Z

creation_time: 1004025447

expiration_date: 2026-05-03T11:59:59Z

Whois rådata

📋

            Domain Name: GRAMMARPHOBIA.COM
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Domain Status: client delete prohibited
Domain Status: client renew prohibited
Domain Status: client transfer prohibited
Domain Status: client update prohibited
Creation Date: 2001-10-25T15:57:27Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-05-03T11:59:59Z
Updated Date: 2025-05-04T16:45:37Z
Name Server: NS07.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS08.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
REGISTRAR Contact: GoDaddy.com, LLC
>>> Last update of RDAP database: 2026-01-23T01:04:57Z

Robots.txt

🤖

			User-agent: *
Disallow: /wp-admin/
Allow: /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php

Sitemap: https://grammarphobia.com/sitemap.xml

SEO revisjon

🔍

Teknisk SEO

✓

Responskode

200

Status 200 OK - siden lastes inn riktig.

✓

Tegnkoding

Page: utf-8, Header: utf-8

Tegnkoding konsistent mellom HTML og overskrifter.

✓

Sidestørrelse

97213 bytes

Sidestørrelse akseptabel for rask lasting.

✓

Ressurser

33 total

Moderat antall ressurser. Vurder å kombinere filer.

✓

Hreflang Tags

0 hreflang tags

Legg til hreflang-tagger hvis du har flerspråklig innhold.

✓

Robots.txt

Exists

Robots.txt-fil funnet.

✓

Sitemap

Declared in robots.txt

Sitemap erklært i robots.txt.

✓

HTTPS

Yes

Sikker HTTPS-tilkobling aktivert.

Komprimering

Aktiver gzip- eller zstd-komprimering for å redusere filstørrelser.

✓

Buffer

public, max-age=2678400

Bufferkontrollhoder er riktig innstilt.

✓

Sidehastighet

0.62 ms

Utmerket lastehastighet.

On-Page SEO

✓

Tittel

Grammarphobia: Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage

God tittellengde (30-60 tegn).

✓

Metabeskrivelse

Grammar, etymology, linguistics, usage, and more from the bestselling language writers Patricia T. O\ Lenght:101

God metabeskrivelseslengde (100-160 tegn).

✓

H1 Overskrift

1 found - "For our spin on English,"

Bra - enkelt H1-overskrift funnet.

✓

Ordtelling

531

God innholdslengde (500-2000 ord anbefales).

Kanonisk merkelapp

Legg til kanonisk tag for å forhindre problemer med duplisert innhold.

✓

Dupliser Meta

[]

Ingen dupliserte metakoder funnet.

✓

Nøkkelord

empty

Meta nøkkelord satt (merk: brukes ikke av store søkemotorer).

Innhold og UX

✓

Språk

Språkattributtet er riktig angitt.

Bilder

9 total, 8 missing ALT

Legg til ALT-tekst i bilder for tilgjengelighet og SEO.

✓

Viewport

width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0

Viewport-metataggen er riktig angitt for mobile enheter.

✓

Åpne Graph

All OG tags present.

Alle viktige OpenGraph-tagger er til stede.

✓

Strukturerte data

1 JSON-LD scripts

Fant strukturerte data (JSON-LD).

Stillinger i Google

Søkefraser - Google

🔍

Posisjon	Uttrykk	Side	Utdrag
2	all is or are	/blog/2006/12/all-is...	The Grammarphobia Blog: “All is” vs. “all are” 18 дек. 2006 г. — If a writer means “all of it,” she should use “is .” If she means “all of them,” she should go with “are.” So it depends on whether your ...
2	full fuller	/blog/2015/07/full-f...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Full, fuller, fullest 31 июл. 2015 г. — “Full” generally means containing as much as possible , but the adjective has many other senses, as in “full of energy,” “full of himself,” “full-fledged,” “a ...
4	all is are	/blog/2006/12/all-is...	The Grammarphobia Blog: “All is” vs. “all are” 18 дек. 2006 г. — If a writer means “all of it,” she should use “is .” If she means “all of them,” she should go with “are.” So it depends on whether your ...
4	who is who has	/blog/2012/03/who-is...	Is “who's” short for “who is” or “who has”? 4 мар. 2012 г. — So “who's” is a legitimate contraction of both “who is” and “who has .” Examples: “Who's he?” … “Who's done the dishes?”.
5	given you	/blog/2023/05/given-...	The Grammarphobia Blog: 'Ask, and it shall be given you' 8 мая 2023 г. — The two clauses, “it shall be given you” and “it shall be given to you” mean the same thing semantically but differ grammatically.
5	to internet	/blog/2020/04/intern...	The Grammarphobia Blog: To internet, or not to internet? 13 апр. 2020 г. — We aren't likely to use “internet” or “science” as a verb , at least not yet. Neither usage is widespread enough.
6(+2)	all are in	/blog/2006/12/all-is...	The Grammarphobia Blog: “All is” vs. “all are” 18 дек. 2006 г. — If a writer means “ all of it,” she should use “is.” If she means “ all of them,” she should go with “are.” So it depends on whether your ...
6	that is one of the	/blog/2016/09/one-of...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Is “one” the one? 23 сент. 2016 г. — So in summary, you can't go wrong with the plural. But go with a singular verb if the “ one ” is uppermost in your mind, and not the class to ...
8	has its	/blog/2022/11/it-is-...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Why 'it's' means 'it is' or 'it has' 14 нояб. 2022 г. — “it's” has been a contraction of both “it is” and “it has” for hundreds of years, though “it's” was once the usual form of the possessive adjective.
8	the or one	/blog/2016/09/one-of...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Is “one” the one? 23 сент. 2016 г. — So in summary, you can't go wrong with the plural . But go with a singular verb if the “one” is uppermost in your mind, and not the class to ...

Stillinger i Yandex

Søkefraser - Yandex

🔍

Posisjon	Uttrykk	Side	Utdrag
4	come going	/blog/2011/11/come-g...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Are you coming or going ? We vote for “Are you coming ?” rather than “Are you going ?” We’ll explain later, but first let’s talk about this business of coming and going .
5	good well best	/blog/2023/03/good-b...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Good , best , or well wishes? A: The usual expression is “ good wishes” or “ best wishes,” but “ well wishes” has been used for hundreds of years in the same sense. All three were first recorded...
5	what is or what are	/blog/2018/03/what-2...	The Grammarphobia Blog: Is ‘what’ singular or plural? As we wrote in 2012, the word “what” can be construed as either singular or plural. It takes its number (singular vs. plural) from the context, and here the context is “books” (plural). Thus, “Books are what make you smarter.”

Tilleggstjenester

💎

grammarphobia.com